CTP insurer claims experience and customer feedback comparison - March 2020
A PDF version of this report is available.
Why does SIRA publish insurer data?
As part of its regulatory oversight, SIRA monitors insurers’ performance through data-gathering and analysis. SIRA helps to hold insurers accountable by being transparent with this data, enabling scheme stakeholders and the wider public to have informed discussions about the performance of the industry.
Additionally, access to insurers’ data will help customers make meaningful comparisons between insurers when purchasing CTP insurance. People injured in motor accidents may also benefit from knowing what to expect from the insurer managing their claim.
In this report, SIRA compares six key indicators of customer experience across the five CTP insurers in NSW: AAMI, Allianz, GIO, NRMA and QBE.
The following evidence-based indicators measure insurer performance over the course of a claim journey:
- the number of statutory benefits claims accepted by insurers
- how quickly insurers pay statutory benefits
- the outcome of claim decisions reviewed by insurers through the insurer’s internal review unit
- the number and outcome of claims referred to the Dispute Resolution Service
- the number and type of compliments and complaints received by SIRA about insurers
- the number and type of issues escalated to SIRA’s Enforcement and Prosecutions team.
This issue of the report presents data for the first 3 measures above, over two time periods: 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 and 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020. The report refers to these periods as years 2019 and 2020. The other measures are presented as per the periods described in the respective sections of the report.
The CTP Insurer Claims Experience and Customer Feedback Comparison results are published each quarter. Future publications will benefit as SIRA continues to improve and expand its data collection and reporting capability.
How many claims (statutory benefit claims) did insurers accept?
Insurers accepted most claims from injured people and their families. Over 98% of claims were accepted in both 2019 and 2020. More detail on the rejected claims is provided on the following table.
Insurer | Year | Percentage of claims accepted | Percentage of claims rejected | Number of claims accepted |
---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI | 2020 | 98.2% | 1.8% | 937 |
AAMI | 2019 | 99.8% | 0.2% | 888 |
Allianz | 2020 | 98.2% | 1.8% | 2,211 |
Allianz | 2019 | 98.7% | 1.3% | 2,111 |
GIO | 2020 | 98.1% | 1.9% | 1,990 |
GIO | 2019 | 99.9% | 0.1% | 2,064 |
NRMA | 2020 | 98.4% | 1.6% | 3,566 |
NRMA | 2019 | 96.1% | 3.9% | 3,459 |
QBE | 2020 | 99.2% | 0.8% | 2,561 |
QBE | 2019 | 99.7% | 0.3% | 2,377 |
Total | 2020 | 98.5% | 1.5% | 11,265 |
Total | 2019 | 98.4% | 1.6% | 10,899 |
Why were claims declined?
Insurers decline claims in certain circumstances under NSW legislation.
The most common reasons for claim denial included:
- late claim lodgement (more than 90 days after their accident),
- insufficient information provided to the insurer,
- the claim did not involve a motor vehicle accident.
1.5% of claims were declined by insurers in 2020, compared to 1.6% in 2019. There were 11,265 total claims accepted in 2020, up from 10,899 in 2019.
Chart 2: Reasons why claims* were declined
Insurer | Number of claims rejected due to late lodgement (>90 days after accident) | Number of claims rejected due to late lodgement (>90 days after accident) |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 7 | 1 |
ALLIANZ | 8 | 11 |
GIO | 16 | 1 |
NRMA | 34 | 48 |
QBE | 10 | 2 |
Total | 75 | 63 |
Insurer | Number of claims declined because insufficient information was provided to the insurer | Number of claims declined because insufficient information was provided to the insurer |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 0 | 0 |
ALLIANZ | 0 | 0 |
GIO | 0 | 0 |
NRMA | 1 | 40 |
QBE | 5 | 0 |
Total | 6 | 40 |
Insurer | Number of claims declined because the claim did not involve a motor vehicle accident | Number of claims declined because the claim did not involve a motor vehicle accident |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 6 | 0 |
ALLIANZ | 24 | 10 |
GIO | 4 | 0 |
NRMA | 3 | 13 |
QBE | 1 | 0 |
Total | 38 | 23 |
Insurer | Number of claims declined because the claim involved an uninsured, unregistered or unidentified vehicle | Number of claims declined because the claim involved an uninsured, unregistered or unidentified vehicle |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 0 | 0 |
ALLIANZ | 8 | 3 |
GIO | 1 | 0 |
NRMA | 8 | 16 |
QBE | 3 | 1 |
Total | 20 | 20 |
Insurer | Number of claims declined because the claim related to a serious driving offence | Number of claims declined because the claim related to a serious driving offence |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 0 | 0 |
ALLIANZ | 0 | 4 |
GIO | 0 | 0 |
NRMA | 5 | 17 |
QBE | 0 | 0 |
Total | 5 | 21 |
Insurer | Number of claims declined for other reasons (Other includes injury not existent, or not covered under the legislation) | Number of claims declined for other reasons (Other includes injury not existent, or not covered under the legislation) |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 4 | 1 |
ALLIANZ | 0 | 0 |
GIO | 18 | 2 |
NRMA | 7 | 7 |
QBE | 1 | 4 |
Total | 30 | 14 |
* Excludes claims which were declined because customers were covered by other scheme/insurer.
How long did it take to receive treatment and care benefits?
Receiving treatment immediately after an accident is critical for making a full recovery. That is why insurers cover initial medical expenses for most people before they lodge a formal claim. This is when customers access treatment and care services after notifying the insurer, but before lodging a formal claim.
75% of injured people received ‘pre-claim support’ in 2020, with a further 20% accessing treatment and care services within the first month after lodging a claim. This result is an improvement on 2019, where 71% of customers accessed treatment and care benefits prior to formally lodging a claim.
Chart 3: Time it takes to receive treatment and care benefits (in weeks)
Insurer | Year | Before Lodgement | 0 to 4 weeks | 5 to 13 weeks | 14 to 26 weeks | Number of claims |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI | 2020 | 66% | 28% | 5% | 1% | 782 |
AAMI | 2019 | 59% | 30% | 9% | 2% | 687 |
Allianz | 2020 | 79% | 17% | 4% | 0% | 1,852 |
Allianz | 2019 | 77% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 1,714 |
GIO | 2020 | 67% | 25% | 7% | 1% | 1,589 |
GIO | 2019 | 60% | 30% | 8% | 2% | 1,565 |
NRMA | 2020 | 78% | 16% | 5% | 1% | 2,941 |
NRMA | 2019 | 77% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 2,727 |
QBE | 2020 | 75% | 20% | 4% | 1% | 1,998 |
QBE | 2019 | 70% | 23% | 6% | 1% | 1,855 |
Total | 2020 | 75% | 20% | 4% | 1% | 9,162 |
Total | 2019 | 71% | 22% | 6% | 1% | 8,548 |
Some insurers cover expenses faster than others. Among the five insurers, Allianz and NRMA had the highest proportion of pre-claim treatment and care support. All insurers improved the proportion of pre-claim support in 2020.
Of the total 11,265 accepted statutory benefits claims in 2020, 9,162 had treatment and care services. For 2020, of the total 10,899 accepted statutory benefits claims, 8,548 had treatment and care services.
How quickly have insurers paid income support to customers after motor accidents?
Some people need to take time off work after an accident. That is why it’s important for insurers to provide income support in the form of weekly payments to people while they are away from work.
Half of customers entitled to income support payments received it within the first month of lodging a claim, with the vast majority receiving the income support payments within 13 weeks.
The sooner the insurer receives the relevant information from the customer, the sooner the insurer can begin to pay income support payment.
Chart 4: Time it takes to receive income support (in weeks)
Insurer | Year | 0 to 4 weeks | 5 to 13 weeks | 14 to 26 weeks | 27 to 52 weeks | Number of claims |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI | 2020 | 52% | 41% | 6% | 1% | 350 |
AAMI | 2019 | 39% | 47% | 13% | 1% | 278 |
Allianz | 2020 | 69% | 25% | 5% | 1% | 787 |
Allianz | 2019 | 45% | 46% | 7% | 2% | 642 |
GIO | 2020 | 48% | 43% | 7% | 2% | 685 |
GIO | 2019 | 43% | 47% | 8% | 2% | 683 |
NRMA | 2020 | 45% | 45% | 9% | 1% | 1,186 |
NRMA | 2019 | 40% | 47% | 11% | 2% | 1,006 |
QBE | 2020 | 44% | 44% | 9% | 3% | 776 |
QBE | 2019 | 35% | 49% | 13% | 2% | 753 |
Total | 2020 | 51% | 40% | 7% | 3% | 3,784 |
Total | 2019 | 40% | 47% | 10% | 3% | 3,362 |
Some insurers begin paying income support faster than others. Among the five insurers, Allianz had the highest proportion of customers who received income support within the first month of lodging a claim.
Overall, the rate of claims paid within the first month has improved significantly by 11% from 2019 to 2020.
*Of the total 11,265 accepted statutory benefits claims in 2020, 3,784 had payments for loss of income. For 2019, of the total 10,899 accepted statutory benefits claims, 3,362 had payments for loss of income
What happened when customers disagreed with the insurer’s decision?
Customers who disagree with the insurer’s decision can ask for a review. The decision will be reconsidered by the insurer’s internal review team, who did not take part in making the original decision. Insurers accepted most applications for internal reviews. However, some applications were declined because:
- the request was submitted late and the customer did not respond to requests for reasons why it was submitted late, or
- the insurer determined it did not have the jurisdiction to conduct an internal review of that decision.
Customers sometimes also withdraw their application for an internal review.
Chart 5: Internal reviews by insurers and status (%)
Insurer | Number of internal reviews | Number of internal reviews |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 233 | 155 |
ALLIANZ | 439 | 332 |
GIO | 586 | 383 |
NRMA | 522 | 544 |
QBE | 442 | 317 |
Total | 2,222 | 1,731 |
Insurer | Percentage of claims withdrawn | Percentage of claims withdrawn |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 11% | 6% |
ALLIANZ | 2% | 1% |
GIO | 8% | 8% |
NRMA | 3% | 3% |
QBE | 9% | 18% |
Total | 6% | 7% |
Insurer | Percentage of claims determined | Percentage of claims determined |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 62% | 52% |
ALLIANZ | 78% | 84% |
GIO | 63% | 61% |
NRMA | 92% | 80% |
QBE | 74% | 70% |
Total | 75% | 72% |
Insurer | Percentage of claims in progress | Percentage of claims in progress |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 26% | 34% |
ALLIANZ | 19% | 14% |
GIO | 29% | 28% |
NRMA | 4% | 4% |
QBE | 8% | 9% |
Total | 17% | 15% |
Insurer | Percentage of claims declined | Percentage of claims declined |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 1% | 8% |
ALLIANZ | 1% | 1% |
GIO | 0% | 3% |
NRMA | 1% | 13% |
QBE | 9% | 3% |
Total | 2% | 6% |
The number of internal review requests received by insurers depends on how many customers they have. Insurers with more customers are more likely to receive a greater number of internal review requests. By measuring insurer internal reviews per 100,000 Green Slips sold, the regulator can compare insurers’ performance regardless of how many customers they have.
Internal reviews per 100,000 Green Slips sold
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
---|---|---|
AAMI | 48 | 35 |
ALLIANZ | 45 | 36 |
GIO | 60 | 39 |
NRMA | 28 | 28 |
QBE | 30 | 22 |
Internal reviews to accepted claims ratio
Insurer | Internal reviews to accepted claims ratio | Internal reviews to accepted claims ratio |
---|---|---|
Insurer | 2020 year | 2019 year |
AAMI | 25% | 17% |
ALLIANZ | 20% | 16% |
GIO | 29% | 19% |
NRMA | 15% | 16% |
QBE | 17% | 13% |
Outcomes of resolved internal reviews
Of the total 1658 resolved internal reviews in 2020, 74% had the initial claim decision upheld. In 2019, 76% resolved internal reviews had the decision upheld.
Chart 6: Outcomes of resolved internal reviews (%)
Year | Decision overturned – in favour of claimant | Decision overturned – in favour of insurer | Decision upheld | Internal reviews | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount of weekly payments | 2020 | 43% | 9% | 48% | 149 |
Amount of weekly payments | 2019 | 60% | 7% | 33% | 86 |
Is injured person mostly at fault | 2020 | 32% | 0% | 68% | 169 |
Is injured person mostly at fault | 2019 | 24% | 0% | 76% | 87 |
Minor Injury | 2020 | 12% | 0% | 88% | 741 |
Minor Injury | 2019 | 13% | 0% | 87% | 677 |
Other review types | 2020 | 33% | 1% | 66% | 221 |
Other review types | 2019 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 202 |
Treatment and Care R&N | 2020 | 31% | 3% | 66% | 378 |
Treatment and Care R&N | 2019 | 32% | 1% | 67% | 198 |
Total | 2020 | 24% | 2% | 74% | 1,658 |
Total | 2019 | 23% | 1% | 76% | 1,250 |
The majority of internal reviews result in the original decision being upheld, although there was a decrease (-2%) in this ratio from 2019 to 2020.
Next quarter’s report will be expanded to include an analysis of the average time taken to complete an application for internal review for each insurer.
What if customers still disagree with the reviewed decision by the insurer?
If the customer continues to disagree with the insurer about their claim after the insurer internal review, customers may apply to the Dispute Resolution Service (DRS) for an independent determination of the dispute. Most applications require an internal review by the insurer prior to applying to DRS.
DRS can assist in resolving disputes in one of two ways:
- Facilitate the formal resolution of issues in dispute between insurer and customer.
- Arrange an independent and binding decision by an expert decision-maker.
Sometimes DRS applications can be:
- Declined by DRS if they are submitted outside the timeframes set by the legislation or the matter is outside the jurisdiction of DRS,
- Withdrawn by the customer, or
- Settled between the customer and insurer outside the DRS formal process.
Chart 7: Dispute resolution cases by insurer and status (%)*
Insurer | Number of DRS reviews | Percentage of DRS Reviews in Progress | Percentage of Withdrawn DRS reviews | Percentage of declined DRS reviews | Percentage of Determined DRS reviews | Percentage of Other DRS*** reviews | DRS Disputes per 100,000 Green Slips sold** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI | 330 | 35% | 9% | 3% | 49% | 4% | 31 |
ALLIANZ | 731 | 30% | 10% | 4% | 49% | 7% | 34 |
GIO | 807 | 38% | 11% | 4% | 42% | 5% | 36 |
NRMA | 1059 | 26% | 13% | 5% | 52% | 4% | 24 |
QBE | 648 | 39% | 10% | 3% | 45% | 3% | 19 |
Total | 3575 | 33% | 11% | 4% | 48% | 4% | 27 |
Chart 8: Outcomes of resolved DRS reviews*
Insurer decision overturned in favour of claimant | Insurer decision overturned in favour of Insurer | Insurer decision Upheld | Other | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Minor Injury | 31% | 0% | 69% | 0% |
Treatment and care R&N | 44% | 0% | 56% | 0% |
Is the injured person mostly at fault | 71% | 0% | 28% | 1% |
Amount of weekly payments | 49% | 0% | 51% | 0% |
All other dispute types | 46% | 1% | 49% | 4% |
Total | 38% | 0% | 61% | 1% |
*Data from 1 Dec 2017 to 31 March 2020
** The number of dispute resolution cases received by DRS depends on how many customers individual insurers have. Insurers with more customers are more likely to receive a greater number of dispute resolution applications. By measuring dispute resolution cases per 100,000 Green Slips sold, the regulator can compare insurers’ performance regardless of how many customers they have
*** Open in error, invalid or dismissed disputes.
Compliments and complaints
SIRA closely monitors the compliments and complaints it receives about insurers. Compliments help
identify best practice in how insurers manage claims, while complaints may highlight problems with
insurers’ conduct which could require further investigation.
How SIRA handles complaints
Customers can lodge complaints through any of SIRA’s channels. Non-complex complaints are handled by SIRA’s CTP Assist service and usually take less than two working days to close*. Complex complaints are referred to SIRA’s complaints handling experts and take more than two working days to close, depending on their complexity. Potential cases of insurer misconduct are escalated to SIRA’s supervision teams for further investigation and possible regulatory action.
Customers who are unhappy with the outcome of SIRA’s review can resubmit their complaint for further consideration. If customers disagree with how SIRA handled their complaint, they can contact the NSW Ombudsman for assistance.
Snapshot of resolved complaints process
Customers are encouraged to talk to their insurer in the first instance; insurers have their own complaints handling process.
- SIRA received 700 complaints. 594 complaints were triaged into the non-complex complaints’ category, and 106 were triaged into the complex complaints category.
- Non-complex complaints are typically resolved within two days. 500 non-complex complaints were resolved.
- 94 non-complex complaints were escalated to complex.
- Complex complaints take >2 days on average to resolve. 241 complex complaints were resolved.
- 112 complex complaints were referred to SIRA’s supervision teams.
Any customers dissatisfied with SIRA’s handling of their complaint can contact the NSW Ombudsman.
This information was collected from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020.
How many compliments and complaints did SIRA receive?
Compliments
Insurer | Number of compliments received |
---|---|
All insurers | 156 |
AAMI | 12 |
ALLIANZ | 36 |
GIO | 24 |
NRMA | 56 |
QBE | 28 |
Compliments per 100,000 Green Slips. The number of compliments and complaints insurers receive depends on how many customers they have. Insurers with more customers will receive more compliments and complaints, and vice versa. Therefore, by measuring compliments and complaints per 100,000 Green Slips sold, the regulator can compare insurers’ performance regardless of how many customers they have.
.
Insurer | Number of compliments received per 100,000 Green Slips |
---|---|
All insurers | 3 |
AAMI | 3 |
ALLIANZ | 4 |
GIO | 2 |
NRMA | 3 |
QBE | 2 |
Complaints
Insurer | Number of complaints received |
---|---|
All Insurers | 700 |
AAMI | 72 |
ALLIANZ | 59 |
GIO | 137 |
NRMA | 259 |
QBE | 173 |
Complaints per 100,000 Green Slips
Insurer | Number of complaints received per 100,000 Green Slips |
---|---|
All insurers | 12 |
AAMI | 15 |
ALLIANZ | 6 |
GIO | 14 |
NRMA | 14 |
QBE | 12 |
Totals
- Compliments 156
- Complaints 700
- Referrals 112
Who complained
- Person injured 326
- Lawyer 285
- Greenslip holder 22
- Health provider 48
- Other 19*
This information was collected from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020.
*The “Other” category are complaints predominantly by SIRA staff for calls to insurers which for various reasons take an unnecessary long time to action.
What were the complaints about?
AAMI
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by AAMI which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 25% |
Claims: Delays | 24% |
Claims: Management | 19% |
Claims: Service | 19% |
Claims: Other | 0% |
Policy: Purchasing | 13% |
Allianz
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by Allianz which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 36% |
Claims: Delays | 14% |
Claims: Management | 19% |
Claims: Service | 24% |
Claims: Other | 2% |
Policy: Purchasing | 5% |
GIO
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by GIO which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 32% |
Claims: Delays | 26% |
Claims: Management | 15% |
Claims: Service | 20% |
Claims: Other | 3% |
Policy: Purchasing | 4% |
NRMA
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by NRMA which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 26% |
Claims: Delays | 31% |
Claims: Management | 13% |
Claims: Service | 25% |
Claims: Other | 4% |
Policy: Purchasing | 1% |
QBE
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by QBE which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 19% |
Claims: Delays | 34% |
Claims: Management | 10% |
Claims: Service | 29% |
Claims: Other | 5% |
Policy: Purchasing | 3% |
All insurer related complaints
Type of complaint | Portion of total complaints received by Insurers which related to that type of complaint |
---|---|
Claims: Decisions | 26% |
Claims: Delays | 28% |
Claims: Management | 14% |
Claims: Service | 25% |
Claims: Other | 3% |
Policy: Purchasing | 4% |
Enforcement & Prosecutions (E&P)
SIRA has continued to improve its strategies in detecting and responding to breaches of the Motor Accident legislation and guidelines. SIRA works closely with law enforcement agencies and other regulatory bodies to ensure appropriate strategies are in place to minimise risks to the CTP scheme.
The E&P team undertakes a risk-based approach to its investigations by taking into consideration the risk and harm to the scheme, claimants and policy holders and carries out appropriate regulatory enforcement action on a case by case basis.
High level approach is summarised as follows:
SIRA receives:
- Internal SIRA referrals
- External referrals
- Risk-based compliance audits
Referrals received go to the E&P team. When the matter is finalised, the following options are available to E&P:
- Education
- Written warnings
- Letter of censure
- Penalty provisions
- Criminal prosecution and licencing withdrawal
- Media releases
For more information about how SIRA approaches its compliance and enforcement activities, please refer to SIRA’s Compliance and Enforcement Policy.
From 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020, 38 matters were referred to the CE&I team for investigation into alleged insurer breaches of their obligations under the legislation and guidelines. A total of 34 matters were finalised during this period, which includes matters received prior to April 2019.
Completed Investigations
Allianz | 3 |
AAMI | 2 |
GIO | 2 |
NRMA | 24 |
QBE | 3 |
TOTAL | 34 |
Regulatory Action
Allianz | 1 | Letter of censure |
AAMI | 1 | Letter of censure |
GIO | - | |
NRMA | 10 | Notice of non-compliance |
NRMA | 1 | Letter of censure |
QBE | 2 | Notice of non-compliance |
QBE | 1 | Letter of censure |
TOTAL | 16 |
Of those matters where an insurer breach was substantiated, the following issues were identified, and insurers subsequently notified:
- Failure to determine or late determination of liability in accordance with timeframes prescribed by the Act and Guidelines;
- Failure to respond or late response to a treatment, rehabilitation and care request by the claimant or their representative;
- Inappropriate management of CTP claims.
The other matters finalised during this period were determined to be insurer practice issues of a minor nature and they have been referred to SIRA’s insurer supervision unit for education and continued monitoring.
Glossary
Accepted claims - The total number of statutory benefit claims where liability was not declined during the first 26 weeks of the benefit entitlement period.
Acceptance rate - The percentage of statutory benefit claims where liability was not declined during the first 26 weeks of the benefit entitlement period. It is the total count of statutory benefit claims lodged, less declined claims, divided by total statutory benefit claims.
Claim - A claim for treatment and care or loss of income regardless of fault under the Act. It excludes early notifications (before a full claim is lodged), as well as interstate, workers compensation and compensation to relatives claims.
Complaint – An expression of dissatisfaction made to or about an organisation and related to its products, services, staff or the handling of a complaint, where a response or resolution is explicitly or implicitly expected or legally required.
Complaints received - The number of complaints that have been received in the time period.
Compliment - An expression of praise.
Declined claims - The total number of statutory benefit claims where the liability is rejected during the first 26 weeks of the benefit entitlement period.
Determined DRS dispute - A dispute which has been through the DRS process and of which a decision has been made.
Dispute Resolution Service (DRS) - A service established under Division 7 of the Act to provide a timely, independent, fair and cost effective system for the resolution of disputes.
Income support payments - Weekly payments to an earner who is injured as a result of a motor accident, and sustains a total or partial loss of earnings as a result of the injury.
Insurer - An insurer holding an in-force licence granted under Division 9.1 of the Act.
Internal review - When requested by a person, the insurer conducts an internal review of decisions made and notifies the person of the result of the review, usually within 14 days of the request.
Internal review types:
- Minor injury - Whether the injury caused by the motor accident is a minor injury for the purposes of the Act.
- Reasonable and necessary treatment and care - Whether any treatment and care provided to the person is reasonable and necessary in the circumstances or relates to the injury caused by the motor accident for the purposes of section 3.24 of the Act (Entitlement to statutory benefits for treatment and care).
- Amount of weekly payments - Whether the amount of statutory benefits payable under section 3.4 (Statutory benefits for funeral expenses) or under Division 3.3 (Weekly payments of statutory benefits) is reasonable.
- Was accident the fault of another - Whether the motor accident was caused mostly by the injured person. This influences a person’s entitlement to statutory benefits (sections 3.28 and 3.36 of the Act).
- Other review types:
- accident verification
- earning capacity impairment
- is death or injury from a NSW accident
- variation of weekly payments
- weekly benefits outside Australia
- recoverable statutory benefits
- reduction for contribution negligence
- serious driving offence exclusion
- permanent impairment
Internal reviews to accepted claims ratio – the proportion of internal reviews to accepted statutory benefit claims. This will remove the influence of the insurer market share and give a comparable view across insurers.
Payments - Payment types may include income support payments, treatment, care, home/vehicle modifications or rehabilitation.
Referrals to Enforcement and Prosecutions (E&P) - Where a potential breach of guidelines or legislation is detected through the management of a complaint in accordance with the SIRA compliance and enforcement policy.
Service start date - The date when treatment or care services are accessed for the first time.
Total number of policies - This figure represents the total (annual) number of policies written under the new CTP scheme with a commencement date during the reporting period. The measure represents the count of all policies, across all regions in NSW.
About the data in this publication
Claims data is primarily sourced from the Universal Claims Database (UCD) which contains information on all claims received under the NSW Motor Accidents CTP scheme, which commenced on 1 December 2017, as provided by individual licensed insurers.
SIRA uses validated data for reporting purposes. Differences to insurers’ own systems can be caused by:
- a delay between claim records being captured in insurer system and data being submitted and processed in the UCD
- claim records submitted by the insurer being blocked by data validation rules in the UCD because of data quality issues.
All CTP compliments and complaints data from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 was collected through SIRA’s complaints and operational systems. Compliments and complaints received directly by the insurers were not included.
For more information about the statistics in this publication, contact [email protected]